“Too political”
To get our advert aired, it first had to be approved by advertising body Clearcast. The first hurdle was being told that Animal Aid, as an organisation, was “too political” to advertise on television because a small part of what we do is to lobby the government for better animal protections. After much back-and-forth and submitting countless documents, we managed to challenge this, and it was onto the next stage of getting the visuals approved…
We knew from the very beginning that we would be restricted visually and that many practices, like dehorning or artificial insemination, could never be shown – despite being routine across the dairy industry and totally legal! But most surprising was the restriction of the words we could use:
- We could not say “Dairy cows suffer for the milk we drink”
- We could not say that calves are taken from their mothers “after birth”
- We could not use our campaign tagline “the terror on our tables is far from the story we’re fed” due to concerns that this would implicate advertisers for allowing the farming industry to use misleading imagery and marketing spiel. Essentially, that advertisers themselves might be part of the problem.
While we’re incredibly proud of the advert we produced, the process was a stark reminder that while the farming industry can continue to pedal misinformation, we were unable to share the full extent of animal suffering with the public. We were asked to substantiate that every single dairy cow “suffer[s] for the milk we drink” – we wonder if industry giants like Müller and Marshfield have to substantiate that every single cow is “well cared for” and “happy”*?
*Claims taken from Müller and Marshfield websites, respectively, on 24 March 2025.
Listen to the original voiceover below