Animal Aid statement on Royal Ascot: heat wave created unacceptable risk to horse’s lives
Royal Ascot ends the life of at least one horse, with multiple whip offences also seen at this year’s event.
Posted 20 Jun 2022

Posted on the 1st January 2004
Following the joint Animal Aid/NAVS High Court challenge to John Prescott, the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) has launched its own important case in which the government and Cambridge University are again in the dock.
“The BUAV is taking the Government to court in a Judicial Review, using our shocking undercover investigation of primate brain research at Cambridge University, as its main evidence.
“The BUAV believes that the Government routinely underestimates (and therefore misrepresents to the public) the level of suffering experienced by animals – particularly primates – used in experiments. The BUAV’s undercover exposé at Cambridge University, as well as many other BUAV investigations dating back over 14 years, provide ample and damning evidence.
“The BUAV aims to show how the Home Office fails to take account of many aspects of lab animal suffering when applying what the law calls the ‘cost:benefit’ test (weighing up the cost to the animal against the perceived benefit of performing the test).
“The BUAV firmly believes that the public is being seriously misled about the extent to which animals are made to suffer in UK labs. The appalling Cambridge experiments (involving monkeys having the top of their skull sawn off and parts of their brain sucked out) were categorised by the Government as causing only ‘moderate’ suffering. The BUAV intends to use its Cambridge investigation evidence to challenge this position.”
Support the campaign against the proposed research labs.
For the full background and latest news see the Cambridge index.
Royal Ascot ends the life of at least one horse, with multiple whip offences also seen at this year’s event.
Posted 20 Jun 2022
An advert by Vegan Friendly UK, in collaboration with vegan food brand Miami Kitchen, was banned by the Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) following 63 complaints about its content.
Posted 19 Jun 2022
By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. More information
The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.